Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Jane Pattison - 1911
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Peter | Report | 9 Oct 2012 19:03 |
Thank you Kay - that explains a lot. Thank you! |
|||
|
K | Report | 9 Oct 2012 05:37 |
Peter - The first family I posted on the previous page in 1911 with Mary and William Pattison and others is actually how the family included David Pattison and his wife Jane with children William and Mary have been incorrectly listed on Anc----try. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 8 Oct 2012 23:17 |
Not really Reggie. |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 8 Oct 2012 23:05 |
linked??????? |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 8 Oct 2012 23:02 |
Oh wow - yes, seems to be him! Wow, is in the other census? |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 8 Oct 2012 21:21 |
Also, can I please see son James Pattison, born 1872 in Darlington, County Durham in the 1901/1911 census please? |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 8 Oct 2012 20:53 |
Thank you Jan. I have the family before 1881 so thank you (just to save you time going back). |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 8 Oct 2012 20:50 |
1881 |
|||
|
Andrew | Report | 8 Oct 2012 20:43 |
Possible for David |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 8 Oct 2012 20:42 |
for info more children in this family 1891 |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 8 Oct 2012 20:37 |
Thank you! |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 8 Oct 2012 20:28 |
no years married ?but this marriage index |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 8 Oct 2012 20:16 |
Hi K, sorry who is the first 1911 family you posted? I am a little confused. |
|||
|
K | Report | 8 Oct 2012 19:27 |
Sorry - Can't see David - I wonder if he died? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
K | Report | 8 Oct 2012 19:21 |
1911? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
K | Report | 8 Oct 2012 19:18 |
1911? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 8 Oct 2012 19:15 |
Oh thank you so much! I have been looking for this for such a long time. They have obviously got their birthplaces mixed up! That with the incorrect surname explains a lot. |
|||
|
K | Report | 8 Oct 2012 19:13 |
This is the family in 1911 - the two chidren William and Jane are correct - the others are completely incorrect and actually are David and Jane - Allotment has posted the detials |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 8 Oct 2012 19:09 |
Thank you Patchem. |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 8 Oct 2012 19:03 |
Have you found the family in 1901? |